Division of Physics:
- Newton: absolute Physics (XVII, XVIII, XIX centuries)
- Einstein: relative Physics (XX century)
- Sibilia: inexorable Physics (XXI century)
With the Theory of Inexorability stops to be relevant the influence of speed (normal and fast) over time and the reference frame of observation (inertial and non-inertial). What really important is that time passes continuously with no return to the past. All observers, in spite of their reference frame, register that a thrown object by one observer always arrives at the same destination.
Elvis Sibilia of America (ESA)
Friday, February 27, 2015
THE THEORY OF INEXORABILITY
The Theory of Inexorability offers an explanation that unifies the Newton's absolute time and the Einstein's relative time. Also this theory unifies all frames of reference without using transforms.
The postulates of this theory are:
1- Time, in any frame of reference, is inexorable or absolute in the sense that the succession of moments is continuous and irreversible. Time (becoming) is unstoppable and unrepeatable. This postulate is represented by --> t (arrow of time).
2- From all frames of reference an object thrown by an observer reaches inexorably the same destination. It is not considered the observed trajectory. This postulate is represented by = d (same destination).
The postulates of this theory are:
1- Time, in any frame of reference, is inexorable or absolute in the sense that the succession of moments is continuous and irreversible. Time (becoming) is unstoppable and unrepeatable. This postulate is represented by --> t (arrow of time).
2- From all frames of reference an object thrown by an observer reaches inexorably the same destination. It is not considered the observed trajectory. This postulate is represented by = d (same destination).
In the picture above the object thrown by the observer on the plane will fall inexorably into their hands.
Elvis Sibilia of America (ESA)
DYNAMIC THEORY OF GRAVITY
Tesla published a prepared statement on his 81st birthday (July 10, 1937) critiquing Albert Einstein's theory of relativity. The following is a portion of that statement:
"... Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curving of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies, and producing the opposite effects, straightening out the curves. Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible. But even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for the motions of the bodies as observed, and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena."
From: http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Tesla's_Dynamic_Theory_of_Gravity
"... Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curving of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies, and producing the opposite effects, straightening out the curves. Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible. But even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for the motions of the bodies as observed, and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena."
From: http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Tesla's_Dynamic_Theory_of_Gravity
Saturday, February 21, 2015
THE COSMOLOGICAL TRUTH
The cosmological truth is scattered in various scientists:
1- Isaac Newton:
a) Right: The Law of universal gravitation.
b) Wrong: infinite speed of gravity.
2- Albert Einstein:
a) Right: relativity of time with respect to speed. To set the speed of light (c) as the maximum speed in the universe.
b) Wrong: to affirm that time is the fourth dimension of space. To affirm that a large mass warps space-time.
3- Nikola Tesla:
a) Right: to hold that space can not be bent, for the simple reason that it can not have properties.
b) Wrong: the belief in the existence of ether.
4- Philochrony:
a) Right: time is independent with respect to the distance (space). Time is not a dimension of space, but becoming. The bending of light passing near the sun is due to the gravity of the sun and not the curvature of space-time.
1- Isaac Newton:
a) Right: The Law of universal gravitation.
b) Wrong: infinite speed of gravity.
2- Albert Einstein:
a) Right: relativity of time with respect to speed. To set the speed of light (c) as the maximum speed in the universe.
b) Wrong: to affirm that time is the fourth dimension of space. To affirm that a large mass warps space-time.
3- Nikola Tesla:
a) Right: to hold that space can not be bent, for the simple reason that it can not have properties.
b) Wrong: the belief in the existence of ether.
4- Philochrony:
a) Right: time is independent with respect to the distance (space). Time is not a dimension of space, but becoming. The bending of light passing near the sun is due to the gravity of the sun and not the curvature of space-time.
DYNAMIC THEORY OF GRAVITY
Tesla published a prepared statement on his 81st birthday (July 10, 1937) critiquing Albert Einstein's theory of relativity. The following is a portion of that statement:
"... Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curving of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies, and producing the opposite effects, straightening out the curves. Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible. But even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for the motions of the bodies as observed, and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena."
From: http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Tesla's_Dynamic_Theory_of_Gravity
"... Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curving of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies, and producing the opposite effects, straightening out the curves. Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible. But even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for the motions of the bodies as observed, and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena."
From: http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Tesla's_Dynamic_Theory_of_Gravity
Monday, February 16, 2015
BECOMING: PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPT
The Philochrony defines the concepts of becoming, duration and time; and makes a connection among these concepts. The key of my conclusions is to affirm that time is the dimension of becoming and not space.
My ideas have been rejected by some people, including physicists, they were not going to glimpse a truth as Philochrony. The concept of becoming is philosophical and it's not used in the natural sciences.
My ideas have been rejected by some people, including physicists, they were not going to glimpse a truth as Philochrony. The concept of becoming is philosophical and it's not used in the natural sciences.
THE DIMENSION OF BECOMING
The laboratory of the Philochrony is the extensive experience combined with a broad reflection on the theme of time. At every stage of our lives we think of a different unit of time; days, weeks, months, years, decades and even centuries. That is why very old people perceive the days fly and that a year passes like a blink.
Clocks measure time that we intuit as a continuous succession of moments. The points of a given period of time not coexist, that is why I came to the conclusion that time is intangible. The time is not perceived sensorialy, we perceive the changes.
Clocks measure time that we intuit as a continuous succession of moments. The points of a given period of time not coexist, that is why I came to the conclusion that time is intangible. The time is not perceived sensorialy, we perceive the changes.
Monday, February 9, 2015
THE BECOMING-TIME DUALITY
Space: n. the three-dimensional area in which material objects are located: Events happen in time and space. To depend: to rely on.
Time depends on the becoming* (matter), no space (distance), hence becoming-time duality arises. The connection between time and space is set to motion.
Prediction:
- Two synchronized atomic clocks located in the same room in a house in New York will always mark the same time.
- If I take one of the clocks and took him to London by land or sea, the two clocks continue to mark the same time. Just maybe if I transport one of the clocks by plane would mark a very minimal difference.
- Eliminating high speed, distance doesn't make clocks have different hours. Of course, not considering the difference in time zones between New York and London.
* Becoming: is the inherent property of matter and bodies to experiment changes continuously.
Time depends on the becoming* (matter), no space (distance), hence becoming-time duality arises. The connection between time and space is set to motion.
Prediction:
- Two synchronized atomic clocks located in the same room in a house in New York will always mark the same time.
- If I take one of the clocks and took him to London by land or sea, the two clocks continue to mark the same time. Just maybe if I transport one of the clocks by plane would mark a very minimal difference.
- Eliminating high speed, distance doesn't make clocks have different hours. Of course, not considering the difference in time zones between New York and London.
* Becoming: is the inherent property of matter and bodies to experiment changes continuously.
Thursday, February 5, 2015
INDEPENDENCE OF TIME
The space-time graphic is valid to explain time dilation, but it is not valid to explain gravity as Einstein suggested.
Time is independent with respect to space (graphic 1), but It's relative with respect speed (graphic 2). Note that in graphic 2 the time has slowed due to high velocity. Let's remember that the letters a and b represent the trajectory of the body or observer and the trajectory of his motion respectively.
Time is independent with respect to space (graphic 1), but It's relative with respect speed (graphic 2). Note that in graphic 2 the time has slowed due to high velocity. Let's remember that the letters a and b represent the trajectory of the body or observer and the trajectory of his motion respectively.
Wednesday, February 4, 2015
THE TRUTH ABOUT THE SPACE-TIME
The Theory of Relativity considers time as a dimension of space. For classical Physics and Philochrony time is independent of space.
In the graphic 1 the observer A is to 2 meters of the obs. B. The trajectory of the obs. A is a straight vertical line. Although the obs. A is still time passes continuously.
In graphic 2 the obs. A moves away from the obs. B at a speed of 1 m/s. His trajectory in the graphic is a inclined straight line.
In the graphic 3 we change the distance for height in the horizontal axis. The vertical axis remains unchanged. If the obs. A jumps up its trajectory is a curve called a parabola, assuming, of course, that a force of gravity pulls him down.
The Philochrony differentiates between the trajectory of the obs. A, as an individual, of the trajectory of his movements. In the space-time graphics the trajectory of beings (bodies or objects) is different of the trajectory of their movements. So in the graphic 4 there are two trajetories: the observer's one such as existing being (a) and his movement (b). What does this tell us? That the vertical axis is while the time coordinate and a coordinate space. In the graphic 3 that we see it's a parabolic movement that takes place in two spatial coordinates. The obs. A jumps, and during the jump the earth has moved.
In conclusion:
1- The trajectory of beings (bodies and objects) and phenomena in the space-time graphics is always a vertical straight line.
2- The curved trajectory correspond to a movement in a graphic of two spatial coordinates.
3- The Albert Einstein's space-time is wrong.
Elvis Sibilia
In the graphic 1 the observer A is to 2 meters of the obs. B. The trajectory of the obs. A is a straight vertical line. Although the obs. A is still time passes continuously.
In graphic 2 the obs. A moves away from the obs. B at a speed of 1 m/s. His trajectory in the graphic is a inclined straight line.
In the graphic 3 we change the distance for height in the horizontal axis. The vertical axis remains unchanged. If the obs. A jumps up its trajectory is a curve called a parabola, assuming, of course, that a force of gravity pulls him down.
The Philochrony differentiates between the trajectory of the obs. A, as an individual, of the trajectory of his movements. In the space-time graphics the trajectory of beings (bodies or objects) is different of the trajectory of their movements. So in the graphic 4 there are two trajetories: the observer's one such as existing being (a) and his movement (b). What does this tell us? That the vertical axis is while the time coordinate and a coordinate space. In the graphic 3 that we see it's a parabolic movement that takes place in two spatial coordinates. The obs. A jumps, and during the jump the earth has moved.
In conclusion:
1- The trajectory of beings (bodies and objects) and phenomena in the space-time graphics is always a vertical straight line.
2- The curved trajectory correspond to a movement in a graphic of two spatial coordinates.
3- The Albert Einstein's space-time is wrong.
Elvis Sibilia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)